Toward the end of last year, a group of Italian researchers led by Barbara Ensoli published some limited data from an ongoing trial of a therapeutic HIV vaccine, and issued a press release to draw attention to the paper. The resulting press coverage was generally favorable. Somewhat lost in the discussion of the results was the fact that they were obtained in an “ad hoc exploratory interim analysis,” which is generally considered to be a dubious and unreliable way to analyze trial data. The vaccine candidate contains the Tat protein from HIV-1, and Ensoli’s group has been developing it for many years now. The question of whether the approach has any potential has been controversial; a macaque study suggesting protection against SHIV was not confirmed and there have also been reports of disputes about the vaccine’s development among the Italian research community. In light of this background, trumpeting the results of an ad hoc exploratory interim analysis via press release seems an imprudent strategy for the researchers to pursue.
The trial described in the paper is not placebo controlled, which adds to the challenge of trying to interpret the results. Because there is no control arm, comparisons in the paper are made between vaccine recipients and HIV positive individuals enrolled in “a parallel prospective observational study at the same sites.” Most of the immunological analyses reported in the paper involve small subsets of the 87 participants, but it is not clear how these subsets were selected. The primary aim of the trial is to compare the immunogenicity (ability to induce anti-Tat immune responses) of two different doses and two different dosing schedules of the vaccine. The secondary aim is to monitor safety. The trial protocol, which is included in the supporting information for the paper, does not make reference to the conduct of ad hoc exploratory interim analyses or their publication.
Amidst this sea of caveats, the researchers report that the higher vaccine dose was more immunogenic but no significant differences were apparent between the 3-dose and 5-dose immunization schedules. The vaccine was also found to be generally safe and well tolerated. From these top-line results, the paper descends into murky sub-analyses suggesting that the vaccine may have decreased CD8 T cell activation, both increased and decreased in CD4 T cell activation (depending on the marker), increased regulatory CD4 T cells, increased CD4 T cells and B cells, decreased CD8 T cells and natural killer cells, and altered representation of different memory T cell subsets. None of the reported analyses are statistically corrected for the multiple comparisons being performed.
Although the suggestion that therapeutic vaccination might reduce immune activation in HIV is not unprecedented, there is a discomforting gap between the murkiness of the methodology and the breezily conclusive title of the paper: “Therapeutic Immunization with HIV-1 Tat Reduces Immune Activation and Loss of Regulatory T-Cells and Improves Immune Function in Subjects on HAART.” The only way to show whether the vaccine can achieve these outcomes is with a randomized placebo-controlled study.
PLoS ONE 5(11): e13540. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.00135
Therapeutic Immunization with HIV-1 Tat Reduces Immune Activation and Loss of Regulatory T-Cells and Improves Immune Function in Subjects on HAART
Barbara Ensoli1*, Stefania Bellino1, Antonella Tripiciano1,2, Olimpia Longo1, Vittorio Francavilla1,2, Simone Marcotullio1, Aurelio Cafaro1, Orietta Picconi1, Giovanni Paniccia1,2, Arianna Scoglio1,2, Angela Arancio2, Cristina Ariola2, Maria J. Ruiz Alvarez1,2, Massimo Campagna2, Donato Scaramuzzi2, Cristina Iori2, Roberto Esposito3, Cristina Mussini3, Florio Ghinelli4, Laura Sighinolfi4, Guido Palamara5, Alessandra Latini5, Gioacchino Angarano6, Nicoletta Ladisa6, Fabrizio Soscia7, Vito S. Mercurio7, Adriano Lazzarin8, Giuseppe Tambussi8, Raffaele Visintini8, Francesco Mazzotta9, Massimo Di Pietro9, Massimo Galli10, Stefano Rusconi10, Giampiero Carosi11, Carlo Torti11, Giovanni Di Perri12, Stefano Bonora12, Fabrizio Ensoli2, Enrico Garaci13
1 National AIDS Center, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy, 2 Core Laboratory of Virology and Immunology, San Gallicano Hospital, “Istituti Fisioterapici Ospetalieri”, Rome, Italy, 3 Division of Infectious Diseases, University Policlinic of Modena, Modena, Italy, 4 Unit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy, 5 Department of Infectious Dermatology, San Gallicano Hospital, Rome, Italy, 6 Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari, Policlinic Hospital, Bari, Italy, 7 Department of Infectious Diseases, S. Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy, 8 Division of Infectious Diseases, S. Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy, 9 Unit of Infectious Diseases, S.M. Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy, 10 Institute of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, University of Milan L. Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy, 11 Division of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy, 12 Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, Turin, Italy, 13 Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
Abstract
Although HAART suppresses HIV replication, it is often unable to restore immune homeostasis. Consequently, non-AIDS-defining diseases are increasingly seen in treated individuals. This is attributed to persistent virus expression in reservoirs and to cell activation. Of note, in CD4+ T cells and monocyte-macrophages of virologically-suppressed individuals, there is continued expression of multi-spliced transcripts encoding HIV regulatory proteins. Among them, Tat is essential for virus gene expression and replication, either in primary infection or for virus reactivation during HAART, when Tat is expressed, released extracellularly and exerts, on both the virus and the immune system, effects that contribute to disease maintenance. Here we report results of an ad hoc exploratory interim analysis (up to 48 weeks) on 87 virologically-suppressed HAART-treated individuals enrolled in a phase II randomized open-label multicentric clinical trial of therapeutic immunization with Tat (ISS T-002). Eighty-eight virologically-suppressed HAART-treated individuals, enrolled in a parallel prospective observational study at the same sites (ISS OBS T-002), served for intergroup comparison. Immunization with Tat was safe, induced durable immune responses, and modified the pattern of CD4+ and CD8+ cellular activation (CD38 and HLA-DR) together with reduction of biochemical activation markers and persistent increases of regulatory T cells. This was accompanied by a progressive increment of CD4+ T cells and B cells with reduction of CD8+ T cells and NK cells, which were independent from the type of antiretroviral regimen. Increase in central and effector memory and reduction in terminally-differentiated effector memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were accompanied by increases of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses against Env and recall antigens. Of note, more immune-compromised individuals experienced greater therapeutic effects. In contrast, these changes were opposite, absent or partial in the OBS population. These findings support the use of Tat immunization to intensify HAART efficacy and to restore immune homeostasis.
Recent Comments